The CBD assessment form is a one-page document that enables evaluation of a candidate’s performance in various clinical domains. The assessor must include constructive feedback. At the end of the interaction both the assessor and the candidate must sign the form.
The CBD form has been developed by the AMC specifically for summative assessment derived from instruments that are publicly available from other institutions (e.g. WBA AMEE guide, Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an assessment tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Medical Teacher. 2007; 29: 860-862 (PDF 1.9 MB).
Areas for assessment
Clinical record keeping
De-identified written or digital records are acceptable. Records should be legible and demonstrate relevance, comprehensiveness and effective communication skills.
Clinical assessment: History and examination
History should be comprehensive, focused and relevant to the presenting problem. It should encompass all active problems, including relevant details of social, family and past history, allergies, current treatments, and elements relevant to the specific discipline (e.g. women’s health, mental health, child health).
The examination should be focused on the system and areas relating to the presenting problem but needs to include all systems relevant to other active problems.
Clinical assessment: Differential diagnoses, summary and problem list
Clinical assessment should have a provisional diagnosis, with reasonable consideration of differential diagnoses and a problem list that includes all active problems. It should include a summary that demonstrates appropriate clinical reasoning.
Management plan: Investigations, treatment and follow-up
Investigations should be targeted, relevant and show an awareness of cost–benefit considerations.
The management plan should demonstrate accurate interpretation of investigations, institution of the appropriate therapy (drugs and/or procedures) and a relevant follow-up plan.
Clinical reasoning should be appropriate to the level of the candidate and based on all available evidence at the time of patient interaction.
Overall performance is a global rating of the candidate’s performance at the appropriate level: Below expected level (1-3), at expected level (4-6), or above expected level (7-9).
At or above expected level (4-9): At the level expected, the candidate demonstrated safe practice, which included acceptable documentation, appropriate clinical reasoning and an ability to justify decisions to enable appropriate management.
Below expected level (1-3): The candidate failed to demonstrate the expected level of clinical care and clinical reasoning to ensure safe practice and enable appropriate management.
The assessor must provide constructive feedback in the written comments section of the form for all levels of performance.